Key facts about fluoride in drinking water:

http://www.fluoridealert.org/issues/caries/who-data/

http://download.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/laneur/PIIS1474442213702783.pdf?id=aaaTWBC2nqdCK4E3_gmru

http://curezone.us/upload/pdf/Fluoride_exposure_in_drinking_water_and_osteosarcoma.pdf But industry lobbyists lie about the real world:

http://www.skepdic.com/fluoridation http://edition.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/07/fluoride.recommendations/index.html

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,190977,00.html

http://www.fluoride-osteosarcoma-law...eosarcoma.html

Lobbyists can earn big money to spread lies about poisons:

http://www.thenhf.com/article.php?id=1225 A pseudo-scientific site spreads lobbyists lies:

Here are two ACSH lobbyists who wrote a pseudo-scientific DOCUMENT:

(What is the link between industry and the "skeptical movement"? ACSH see SourceWatch on ACSH:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...nce_and_Health)

Unserious companies like ACSH, because through them, they can bring out propaganda without revealing that they are behind. ACSH hire "independent" "scientists" who put their name on the propaganda.

http://www.scienceinmedicine.org/pol...idationist.pdf

and ACSH is supported by these lobbyists and pseudo-skeptical who ignore public health:

http://www.scienceinmedicine.org/fellows/ But the protests are increasing.

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/ar...n.aspx?np=true

Världens bästa kiropraktik utbildning?



http://www.nuhs.edu/admissions/chiropractic-medicine/

Do we not need a medical policy in public interest?

Is AMA one fellowship to protect AMAs own interests?
                    or
Is AMA one fellowship to protect public health?

AMAs war against chiropractic lead to the questions above.

Are the answers below?:


http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/12/30/rethinking-medical-associations-best-interests.aspx
http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id=54778
http://www.naturopathydigest.com/archives/2006/aug/editor.php